I'd done some reading up on early Currant jelly recipes. Several different books have almost the exact same recipe and the others are very similar.
The exact recipe I used came from The Frugal Housewife or Complete Woman Cook. This edition is dated 1796 out of Philadelphia. I've also seen an edition dated 1803.
It takes a little bit of interpretation to read this volume as it uses two different letters for S, in 3 different places. If it's an S at the end of a word, it's written as an S as we know it today. If it is at the beginning or in the middle of a word, then it's written as an f. This works well, except of course when f at the beginning of a word is actually an f. Then you have to read it to be certain of the meaning. Thus stript (stripped) is written ftript., stalks is ftalks, stone is ftone, skim is fkim, fast is faft and fine is fine. Once you get the the rhythm going, it becomes fairly easy to read.
Having finally decided on a game plan, I took out the frozen currants and stuck them in a stock pot. The original recipes call for putting the currants in a stone jar and setting that in a pot of water in order to cook the currants to make the juice which is needed for the jelly process. However not having a stone jar, crock or even a glass jar which would work for the amount of currants and because they were frozen into 4 separate solid masses I chose to dump them unceremoniously into my stock pot and cook them directly over the heat. I added 1 cup of water to the pot in order to help keep them from burning as they thawed out. I put the stove on very low heat and watched carefully. Because the heat was so low, it took a long time to thaw but I didn't have any issues with burning the currants.
Cloudy currant juice due to squeezing the jelly bags |
The first batch made less than 2 cups of jelly which I packaged in 125 ml (half cup) jars. I'd started up the water bath canner earlier, so it was full of hot water. Because my jar rack was too large for these tiny jars, I put a dish cloth in the bottom of the pan and the jars on top, to try to keep them from bumping together. I processed them for about 12 minutes, dragged them out and luckily the lids all did that lovely vacuum pop to announce that they'd sealed.
I can't actually tell which jars were the cloudy juice and which were the clear. The open jar has the leftovers of both batches and the only way you can tell the difference of which layer was which is because there is a line where the first batch had cooled before I topped it off with the second.
This jam is incredibly delicious. It's sweet enough but still with the tartness of the currants. I hesitate to say that it might even be better than the Apricot jam. The only thing I would recommend is that if you're going to listen to music while making this, don't presume that one CD will be long enough, because it won't be, not even the second time you try with the next batch.
hm, nice - I never have enough red currants to make jelly, because the blackbirds always invite their friends as soon as the first pink blush is visible:( but I bought a batch of nectarines and mangoes on offer and just made the jam an hour ago - yummeh:) and for jelly (blackberries look to be plentiful this year) I use my juice steam pot, which saves me from jelly bags and such.... takes up space, but makes lovely juice!
ReplyDeleteenjoy your jelly - I wouldn't care much about cloudy or not either, as long as it tastes good:)
(and the funny "s" reminds me of suetterlin script..... the bane of my school days:)